The doctrine of the international executive process and its influence on the improvement of the legislation on executive proceedings

The part of the monograph is devoted to specific issues of the theory and practice of the international enforcement process, analyzed international acts and national legislation, which regulate the enforcement of decisions of courts and other bodies (officials) that include a foreign element in relations also taking into account the unprovoked war against Ukraine.
The path to European integration chosen by Ukraine is not consistent with the essential problems of the modern executive process of Ukraine, since the legal doctrine has not yet revealed the specifics of
executive proceedings in the EU countries, many international treaties on legal assistance lack the principle of reciprocity, the issue of the execution of decisions with a subterranean element in Ukraine is declarative nature, etc. This, in turn, has a negative effect on guarantees of protection of the rights of Ukrainian citizens in EU countries and foreign citizens in Ukraine. For these reasons, a deep and comprehensive rethinking of the legal significance of the international aspect in the legal system of Ukraine is necessary, taking into additional account the new war and post-war realities.
The place of the international enforcement process in the legal system and its relationship with other branches of law are analyzed.
The international executive process is a sub-branch of the executive process, causing the attention of scientists and a wide expert audience to the study and regulation of issues with a foreign element, the study of foreign experience in this area, as well as the appropriate determination of issues of  nforcement of decisions in international treatiesconcluded by Ukraine.
Procedural features of enforcement actions in the international enforcement process have been identified. The problems of implementation of executive proceedings regarding the decisions of courts and other jurisdictional bodies issued in another state, as well as issues that arise when the state executes decisions with a foreign element at the expense of state funds are considered.
Several improvement directions of the coercive enforcement procedure in international enforcement process have been suggested.